To start with the basics,
a fibreglass or GRP (glass reinforced plastic) moulding is
made up of thin glass filaments or strands, either woven into
cloth, or in randomly assembled mats, bound together with
a plastic resin. On their own the glass strands are strong
but not stiff, and the resin is stiff but not strong. When
joined together as the resin sets chemically, the result is
both strong and stiff, and very durable. Ideally the final
moulding should have lots of glass and only enough resin to
hold it together and seal in the glass strands, but most conventional
mouldings have much more resin than this ideal.
Various types of resins, and various
types of cloths and mats are used. A typical moulded GRP yacht
hull will have as its outer layer a thin coating of a special
resin called gelcoat, which forms the hard glossy outer surface
of the hull. Inside this will be several layers of glass mat,
often reinforced with one or more layers of ‘woven rovings’
- glass strands woven into a thick cloth, all bound together
into a single structure by the resin. Most yacht builders * mould the hulls layer by layer,
letting one layer of glass and resin set before putting on
the next. Provided the hull is moulded properly, without long
delays between layers, all parts of the moulding bond chemically
into a single body - unlike, for example plywood, where a
number of distinct layers are glued together.
SCRIMP and other resin infusion or vacuum bagging processes
* The one exception to the ‘layer by
layer’ moulding process is vacuum bagging or resin infusion
moulding, where all the dry layers of glass cloth and mat
are laid in a mould, and held in place by either an inflated
plastic balloon, or another close-matching mould. The resin
is then drawn into the fibres by vacuum suction. The process
is more expensive than standard moulding, but is capable of
producing very light, strong laminates with a high glass content,
and very importantly, very few air bubbles in the resin/glass
composite. Resin infusion moulding, using vinylester resins,
ought to produce GRP hulls that are virtually proof against
osmosis, but the process and materials has not been around
long enough for this to be proven. These types of mouldings
originally were most often used for high-tech racing hulls,
often in conjunction with carbon fibre and/or kevlar instead
of glass fibres, mainly to allow lighter weight construction.
The system is however becoming much more common for mainstream
cruising boat building, as the process is also more environmentally
friendly than conventional lay-up moulding
The resins used vary. The earliest resins used, back in the
1960s, were orthopthalic polyester resins. By around 1980, isopthalic
polyester resins started to be used as well by some builders, as
they were more water resistant, although more expensive. Most builders
used these more expensive isopthalic resins only for the first outer
coats, and then saved money by using the cheaper orthopthalic resins
for the inner layers. A few used isopthalic all the way through.
Some builders have also used double layers of gelcoat, in an attempt
to stop osmosis occurring. It did not generally help to stop osmosis
The latest type of resin is called vinylester, and is said to be
even more waterproof than isopthalic polyester. It is of course
even more expensive, and the same option of using only as an outer
layer is open to builders if they are trying to cut costs, as all
yacht builders almost invariably are.
text below from a brochure for a £250,000 plus sailing
The cost difference between
'vinyl', 'iso' and 'ortho' resins is such that many yacht
builders still only use isopthalic or vinylester resins for
the outer layers, completing the inner bulk of the fibreglass
layup with cheaper orthopthalic resins, and non powder bound
mat. Note the exact wording of the hull specification at right,
taken word for word from the brochure for a very expensive
yacht. There are however some builders who are using isopthalic
or vinylester resins throughout - those who do generally tell
While new yacht brochures will go to some lengths to tell
you about the exotic woods used in the interior, the Corian
worktops or the leather covered wheel, very few will actually
give a layup specification for the hull. Most do however
mention the gelcoat used, some builders claiming that 'their'
special gelcoat will prevent osmosis. Unfortunately they
only guarantee this for five years.
Despite most people’s assumptions to the contrary, fibreglass mouldings, no matter what resins are used, are
not actually totally waterproof. Individual water
molecules are so small that they can actually find their way into
and ultimately right through the layers of glass and resin forming
a boat hull, or GRP pond liner. This in itself is not osmosis, it
is simply a minute degree of permeability of the material.
The problems start to occur when the water molecules migrating
into and through the GRP encounter other chemicals inside the laminate,
primarily water-soluble materials (WSMs) such as the the emulsion
binders used to hold some types of glass mat together before it is moulded,
or pockets of uncured or only partly cured resins in the moulding.
The water molecules can then have a chemical reaction with these
substances, forming larger molecules of a new chemical, often acidic
- which unlike the original small water molecules, cannot carry
on passing through the GRP. These larger molecules are then trapped.
This is the point at which osmosis actually starts. The process
of osmosis is the same mechanism by which plants and trees draw
water up from the soil to their branches and leaves, and is described
in a dictionary as:-
Diffusion of fluid through a semipermeable membrane from a solution
with a low solute concentration to a solution with a higher solute
concentration until there is an equal concentration of fluid on
both sides of the membrane. The tendency of fluids to diffuse in
such a manner.
The important parts are that the hull is not waterproof (it
is a semi-permeable material), and that osmosis causes a low concentration
fluid (water) to pass through the hull to join the higher concentration
fluid (the chemical mix formed by the water plus WSM) inside the
Pressure is thus built up inside the laminate. If this process
takes place in a solid part of the laminate, there is usually no
problem as the structure is strong enough to contain the pressure.
If however it takes place on the boundary of a small air-bubble
in the moulding, or at a point where layers of GRP are poorly bonded,
the resultant new chemical compound or compounds slowly fill up
the bubbles or the minute gaps between layers with liquid. Almost
all mouldings have these air bubbles and small areas of poor bonding,
although they should not. Ideally the resin should totally fill
the gaps between the glass strands, and every layer should perfectly
bond to the next. In practice, however, this is extremely difficult
to achieve with conventional moulding techniques.
The process of osmosis in GRP is however very slow, unless the
moulding is appallingly badly made, and no matter how long it remains
in water a typical GRP laminate cannot absorb more than about 2-3%
of it’s own weight of water. Surveyors and boatyards (and
some brokers, including Yachtsnet) put moisture meters on yachts hulls to check the moisture
content, on the basis, often but not always correct, that high moisture
levels in the GRP are a precursor to the development of blisters.
If this osmosis (using the term in it’s correct manner
for once) was all that happened, it would be a very minor problem.
Even completely saturated with water molecules, a GRP laminate still
retains most of it’s strength, although it does become slightly
more flexible and weighs a tiny bit more. Racers who want stiff hulls with the absolute minimum
weight already mostly keep their boats ashore when not sailing,
and for any properly built cruising boat 2% or so extra weight and
a trace more flexibility in the structure should not be a problem.
Once again, if the air bubble simply filled with
this acidic compound, the problem would still be relatively minor.
However the nature of the osmosis process is that water molecules
keep osmosing through the laminate, and join the chemicals in the
bubble, steadily building up hydraulic pressure. Eventually this
causes the surface of the moulding to blister.
These blisters are the typical sign of what boat-owners
usually refer to as ‘osmosis’. When pierced these blisters
will give off a small amount of chemical-smelling (usually vinegary)
liquid - which is the juice built up inside the pressure-raised
blisters. The term ‘blister juice’ is often used. This
‘blister juice’, which is usually acid, can break down
the polyester. This breakdown process is known as hydrolysis,
and causes a reduction in strength of the laminate. This is however
normally very localised, and the moulding as a whole will still
retain most of it’s strength despite blistering. Most blisters
are in the interface between the gelcoat and the structural laminate,
and have very little effect on the hull's overall strength. Only
if the blisters are very large, or very deep-seated, are blisters
generally a structural problem.
Two photos of the same blisters on
the topsides of a yacht - chosen for the clear view of the blisters
Blisters are often difficult to see - it is fairly rare
to find them as obvious as the medium sized (approx 3/4 "
diameter) blister seen here. Another smaller blister is visible
to the left of the picture
In a closer view (with the image contrast increased) you
can also see faint traces of a group of smaller pimple-sized blisters
forming in the centre of the picture above, closer to the waterline
It is rare, but not that rare, to find osmotic
blisters above the waterline. They can however occur anywhere on
a GRP moulding. More often they are found underwater, often partially
obscured by layers of antifouling paint, though they are also very
common inside glassfibre fresh water tanks. When looking for blisters
on a hull, shining a light along the hull surface can help, as can
wetting areas of the antifouled hull surface to make it shinier.
The yacht in the photos above had been given a below-waterline 'osmosis
treatment' at some previous date, and the bottom was now in good
condition, with low moisture levels by a moisture meter. The topsides
however gave very high readings, and had a fair number of blisters.
One scientific study of the problem of blistering was given
in the paper "Causes
of Boat hull blistering". This 1987 study was carried out
by Thomas Rockett, Ph.D. and Vincent Rose, Ph.D., at the University
of Rhode Island, and was partly funded by the US Coastguard Service.
Yacht hulls are typically built with a substantial
safety margin of thickness and strength, and it is incredibly rare
to find a yacht hull that is seriously weakened even by very advanced
osmotic blistering. Often, the older the boat the heavier the original
construction, and the greater margin of safety. Most blistering
occurs near the outer surface of the moulding, usually in the borderline
between gelcoat and underlying layers of resin and glass - and the
gelcoat is largely cosmetic and not structural.
Many older and more traditional GRP yachts are built with what
is, by modern standards, a massively heavy GRP layup. Although
many of these boats may have been built with what is now known
to be less than ideal materials, often in conditions far removed
from a modern climate-controlled moulding shop, the fact remains
that many such boats, dating back to the 1960s, 1970s and occasionally
even earlier, are still around, and in many cases exhibiting no
signs of osmosis. On a very heavily built GRP hull such as this
Seadog ketch, even quite severe osmotic blistering of the gelcoat
is unlikely to weaken the hull in any significant way. Whether
typical modern mass production yacht hulls have as great a margin
of safety of structural strength is dubious
(the boat shown at left here did not, by the way, have any signs
of osmosis on its last survey!)
"What is universally agreed is that
osmosis discovered within the very early years
of a vessel's life
is bad .... " from 'Surveying Small Craft' by Ian Nicolson
Once blisters in the gelcoat have appeared, a period
of storage ashore, particularly in warm dry weather, may cause many
shallower blisters to apparently disappear, as most of the water
in the blisters dries out. What is left behind, though, is a highly
concentrated solution or even crystals of the 'blister juice', which
will usually rapidly re-absorb water once the hull is put back into
Normal winter periods ashore definitely slow down
the process of yacht hulls developing osmosis, as they do
partially dry out each winter, even in northern European weather. However you cannot simply
dry out a wet hull by leaving the boat ashore for a few
months - water that took fifteen or twenty years to get
into a laminate does not escape in months, unless the gelcoat
is removed as is done in "osmosis treatments"
As brokers, we have many times seen situations where an older boat that has previously always been wintered ashore every year, is for once left afloat for an 18 or 20 month period, and is found to have developed blisters when lifted for survey.
The process of osmosis is fairly well advanced by
the time visible blisters start to appear on the bottom of a hull. It must be realised however, that
the process starts the minute a new yacht is craned into the water,
or even when it’s hull and deck first gets rained on as it
is wheeled out of the factory.
Another facet of water absorption into a hull is
known as ‘wicking’. This refers to
the ability of water molecules to creep along the boundary of the
individual strands of glass within the moulding. A totally dry moulding,
if moulded with clear resin, will be virtually transparent. If you
can see individual strands of glass as whitish threads, what you
are seeing is not the glass strands themselves, but microscopic
traces of water around the strands. This ‘wicking’ is
an indication that there is a significant amount of moisture in
the resin, and is often a precursor to or accompanies blistering.
Unless very severe, wicking is much more difficult to detect if
the layup moulding resin is white or coloured rather than clear.
It is generally accepted that clear resin is less likely to suffer
from osmosis or wicking than pigmented resins, and many quality
builders use clear resins for at least the underwater areas of their
hulls. We thus have a "Catch 22" situation that the better
quality mouldings, with clear resins used, are more likely to be
found to have wicking - 'found' being the significant word!
Just as the tests for astronauts in the space programme
proved that anyone would get motion sickness if shaken around enough,
all GRP yachts, from the day they are built, suffer from osmosis.
Manufacturers now typically offer five year hull warranties, and
it has been said - cynically but probably accurately - that their
main concern is not to build yachts that do not suffer osmosis,
but to do just enough that they don’t get visible blisters
within the warranty period, which for most yachts is 5 years. Several
US manufacturers of small power boats, however, now state in their
warranty conditions that the boats are not to be left afloat for
more than 2 weeks, or the warranty against blisters is invalid!
At least one US builder will not offer any warranty at all against
The fact remains that in practice some yachts ‘get
osmosis’ - ie blisters, and some don’t. It is known
that several factors increase the likelihood of blistering. These
Long periods afloat without layups
Warm tropical waters
Fresh water is worse than salt water
Coloured resins (including white - the most common) are
worse than clear resins
Historically, there have been some batches of boats
that have suffered severely from blistering. Often this was due
to changes in layup specification, and use of new materials. For
example, it is now known that the use of PVA emulsion bound glass
mats is bad practice. Emulsion bound mats were introduced in the
1960s as an improvement, and accepted by Lloyds and other classification
societies for standards of hull construction for almost 20 years.
Emulsion bound mats are now regarded as bad, as the PVA is water
soluble, and tends to encourage wicking. Mats used now should be
powder bound, especially in the outer layers of a laminate. Nevertheless,
plenty of yacht builders still use emulsion bound glass mat in inner layers
of hull layups.
Whilst some builders, including those who produce
some very expensive boats, have had runs of boats prone to blistering,
they have also turned out apparently identical boats that have not
blistered. Current thinking is that cleanliness, temperature and
humidity control in the moulding shop, and precision of the mix
of resins, are the key to building boats that will not blister.
Nevertheless I know of one builder who worked in a dirty corrugated
iron shed where the climate control was dependent on whether an easterly
wind blows through the gaps in the door. His boats actually had
a rather good reputation for ‘not getting osmosis’.
Whilst all GRP boats slowly absorb some water, it
should not be fast. Visible blisters or wicking are an indication
of a well developed absorption of water, and if they occur in the
first few years of a boats life are an indication of a moulding
problem of some sort, whether it be poor materials, poor workmanship
by the laminators, or any other quality control problem ranging
from sawdust getting into the moulding to a prolonged delay (factory
holiday - several people off with flu?) between laminating up the
various layers that form the hull. If the builder is still trading
they will normally repair this under warranty. Unfortunately whilst
the original bare hull moulding of a £100,000 yacht might
only cost £12,000 to mould, it will cost another £50,000
plus to fit it out even if using every removable part from the faulty
hull. So the builders will ‘treat’ the ‘osmosis’
by the standard current method, namely stripping off the external
gelcoat, drying out, and recoating with epoxy fillers. As this new
external coating is essentially ‘glued on’, and not
chemically part of the original moulding as was the original gelcoat,
it can be argued that the boat is substantially devalued by this
By ten to fifteen years age it is common to find
that yachts hulls have a moderate to high moisture content. Some
may also have developed a few blisters. This is absolutely typical,
and not necessarily a sign that there is anything terribly wrong
with the boat.
If a yacht reaches twenty or thirty years of age without high
moisture content or visible blisters it is actually a bit of a surprise.
These timescales assume a standard mass production
yacht, given average use of perhaps seven or eight months afloat
a year, with just antifouling paint on the bottom. Painting the hull bottom with epoxy coatings can considerably, but
not totally, slow down the rate of water absorption, and some builders
do this from new (including the local tin-shed boatbuilder referred
to earlier). Opinions vary as to the effectiveness of epoxying or
painting once there is already some moisture in the moulding.
On boats which have been painted or epoxied, it is not
uncommon to find, after a few years, blisters in the interface
between the epoxy/paint coating and the gelcoat. This is
obviously less of a problem than blisters under the gelcoat
itself. Some experts believe that paint or epoxy coatings
are not a 'once-and-for-all' protection, but should be renewed
regularly to maintain effectiveness.
Treatments for ‘osmosis’ range
Do nothing. On an old, heavily
built boat, this is a genuine option. If there are no blisters
I would definitely do nothing even if a moisture meter shows
very high readings. If there are blisters but they are small
and not too many they are not likely to have any significant
effect on the structural strength
"Thousands of boats are sailing happily
throughout the world with high moisture readings and an underwater
hull resembling bubble wrap. Just keep an eye on the situation.
..." from 'Practical Boat Owner' August 2005
Local treatment. Cut or grind open individual
blisters, repeatedly wash out with hot water or steam, to
remove the ‘blister juice’ from any blisters,
dry thoroughly and fill with epoxy paste (not car body filler).
Next winter you may have a few more blisters - usually in
different places. The fact that they are usually in different
places is a significant one - you are not getting blisters
re-occurring but new ones developing. Hugo du Plessis, author
of what is virtually the standard reference work on the construction
of GRP yachts, regards this as the best option in almost all
cases, and says total gelcoat replacement (see below) should
be an absolute last recourse
"Many gel coats which could be saved at no great
cost are destroyed quite unnecessarily...." from
'Fibreglass Boats' 4th Edition, 2006, by Hugo du Plessis
Go to your local ‘Osmosis Treatment Centre’ and pay rather a lot to have the gelcoat removed,
the hull washed and dried out, and the hull recoated with
epoxy. The smaller and older the boat the less cost-effective
this is. Treating an old 25 foot boat could cost almost
£5,000 on a boat perhaps only worth under £10,000. On
a 50-footer worth £150,000 the cost might be £15,000
- a far lower proportion of the boat’s value. Yards
used to offer a five year warranty with this work - many no
longer do so, or charge extra if you want the warranty (they
buy insurance against claims).
"The sooner you treat it the less it will cost
you and the more your boat will retain its value....." from the 2011 website of a company specialising in osmosis
* One factor that is becoming increasingly
apparent is that early osmosis treatment on the basis of high
moisture readings alone, or a few small blisters, is not actually a
good idea - it seems to be better to allow the blistering
to develop fully before carrying out an "osmosis treatment".
If you are keeping the boat yourself you can look at these options and decide which way to go depending
on inclination, temperament and bank balance.
If you are trying to sell the boat,
other factors come into play. Buyers almost always prefer boats
without blisters, and even if there are no actual blisters, once
a surveyor puts a moisture meter on the hull and says there is moisture
in there, most buyers think “.... if I buy this it’ll
get blisters soon and then I’ll have to spend thousands on
an osmosis treatment” - so a ‘wet’ hull,
even if unblistered, is much more difficult to sell.
Unfortunately it is a common perception that any
boat with a high moisture content or blisters, MUST be treated,
and that the only treatment is the full Monty - strip off all the
gelcoat and recoat. Boatyards like doing the work: it is profitable,
and can be time-scheduled in to when staff have some free time.
Some surveyors like to recommend it as it means they’ve ‘covered
their backs’ against a later claim that they didn’t
pick up a defect.
It is certainly easier to sell an boat with no blisters
and a low moisture content - so particularly on larger boats (a
£10,000 hit on a £100,000 sale is not too disastrous)
getting an ‘osmosis treatment’ done is often the way
to go. You do however have to allow time for the work to be done
- ranging from about 4 weeks if forced drying or a process called
‘hot-vac’ is used, to three to six months or even longer
if the hull is left to dry out naturally in the open air, although
shielded from rain.
If you go for the option of treating blisters locally,
the hull will still be wet, although with no blisters. A surveyor
will probably report this, and a phrase along the lines of “....
it may be necessary to carry out an osmosis treatment in a year
or two” is very common in survey reports. Certainly it
may be. Or it may not. Either way the surveyor can’t be sued
for negligence for failing to point something out.
If you are buying a boat, obviously
it is preferable to have one with no blisters and a dry hull (low
moisture levels on the magic meter). If this condition is achieved
by the original hull surface, with no repairs, it is clearly better
than a similar boat that is also dry and with no blisters, but achieved
by having recently had an ‘osmosis treatment’. The treatments
are not cures - they simply 'restart the clock' on a progressive
slow period of absorption of water again, as even epoxy coatings are
not totally waterproof. Nevertheless, do not reject an older boat just because it has had an osmosis treatment - as it may be quite impossible to find another of the same age and type with a dry original hull surface.
If you are looking to buy a small - 20 to 30 foot or so - boat at relatively low cost you will inevitably be looking at boats of 20 or more years of age. It is almost inevitable that most of these will have either highish moisture levels in the hull, or have some blisters. Even if blisters are not obvious when you look at the boat yourself, once a surveyor has scraped off antifouling in patches it is likely that he will find tiny beginnings of blisters - "baby blisters" as one surveyor describes them. You can go through a lot of expensive surveys, rejecting boats, before you find the rare one that has a perfect hull.
Occasionally buyers will happily accept a boat with
high moisture content or obvious blisters - on the ground that they can
haggle down the price as a result. They then may or may not then
get some form of treatment done - perhaps just before they sell
it on a few years later.
If a seller is genuinely unaware of the moisture
content/blisters, a situation which is not uncommon, as many blisters
are small and can be invisible under antifouling, and this is discovered
on survey, a common compromise is to knock about half the cost of
an ‘osmosis treatment’ for that size of boat off the
price. It is unfair to expect the owner to take the full price off,
as if the gelcoat is replaced the boat is more saleable, and hence
more valuable, as it then has a known low moisture content and no
blisters. This "split the cost" compromise is often agreed for medium to large boats, but for small, low value boats the cost of having a full osmosis treatment done is so high in relation to the boat's value that it is rarely possible to reach this compromise between buyer and seller.
The first thing to know about moisture meters
is that they don’t actually measure moisture. They
measure conductivity. My Tramex meter (a popular model with surveyors
and boatyards) invariably shows a very high moisture reading on
the solid and absolutely dry glass top of my living room coffee
table. It’s measuring the presence of minute traces of carbon
(an electrical conductor) in the lightly smoked glass.
For this reason these meters are only of value when used comparatively.
A reading of the underwater body alone is valueless - the glassfibre
gelcoat may be made with pigment that is itself slightly conductive. For
this reason it is usual for test readings also to be made on the
topsides - if the hull topsides well above the waterline consistently
read medium or high then there is certainly reason to doubt whether a high reading below the waterline really means moisture - although it could of course
also be the case that there is water in the topsides laminate
too - perhaps from leaks along the gunwale joint.
Tramex meters read
quite deep into the moulding - deep enough to be fooled by materials
inside the hull. I have been told by a surveyor that the bilge keels
of a Seadog ketch had a surprisingly high moisture level compared
to the rest of the hull. I told him (although I’m sure he
would have worked it out for himself eventually) that these hollow
bilge keels were the water tanks in this design, and currently near
full. Bilge water in compartments inside the hull, metal reinforcements,
wiring harnesses, even condensation inside inner hull linings, can
affect the readings of meters.
Sovereign meters, another common
type, generally read to a much shallower depth. This can be either
good or bad, depending on what you are trying to measure - surface
moisture or deep seated moisture. The newest Tramex meters have
an extra mode switch to reduce the depth of the reading. To make
matters still more complex, the Sovereign and Tramex meters give
results on different scales of sensitivity - Tramex from 0-30 and 0-100 and Sovereign from
0-25 and 0-100. So a reading of ‘20' could be quite good or quite bad,
depending on which meter was used on which scale. Most yacht surveyors quote Tramex readings as 0-100 and Sovereign readings as 0-25.
None of these moisture meters give an absolute reading
of the amount of water in a structure: all they do is tell you that
if readings in one area are higher than another, then that area
might be wetter. It also might not. You could be reading
the presence of something else that conducts electricity.
It is common for surveyors to take moisture readings
on hulls during a brief (often just 1 hour or so) lift-out. Particularly
with older boats, built using orthopthalic resins, high readings
will almost always be obtained immediately after hauling out, but
these will often drop substantially if left ashore for a few days. This effect
is less pronounced with isopthalic or vinylester resins - they are
better at keeping out the water in the first place, but do not let
it dry out again as easily.
Whilst epoxy coatings offer some protection to hulls from water absorption, the epoxies themselves can absorb water, and be slow to dry out - up to two weeks is sometimes quoted. For most pre-purchase yacht surveys, having two weeks ashore before readings are taken may not be practical.
The International Institute of Marine Surveyors
Code of Practice for marine surveyors recommends that "...
ideally the vessel should have been out of water for at least 24
hours". It also sets out a complex form of statistical
calculation to reduce randomness of readings and take into account
local temperature and humidity when measurements are taken. I have
yet to see a yacht survey report that actually used this calculation.
There is a common myth that drying out a boat with an osmosis treatment will make the boat much lighter, as tons of water will have soaked into the hull. In fact, no matter how "wet" the GRP is, it can only hold a maximum of around 2% to 3% water, and the GRP itself only forms maybe 20% at most of a typical sailing yacht's total displacement. So 2% of 20% of a 12,000 lb displacement 35-footer is 48 to 64 lbs of water that could be dried out by an osmosis treatment. This would alter the waterline by a tiny fraction of an inch. The stories you hear of boats floating several inches higher on their waterline after osmosis treatments are not due to removing weight - it just means that the new waterline boot-top is often painted several inches higher after the treatment, to disguse the imperfect joint line between original gelcoat topsides and epoxy treated bottom.
The only time a boat can really put on major amounts of weight through water absorption is with foam-cored or balsa sandwich hulls, where the core material itself has become saturated, though this is more usually due to damage rather than normal use.
Quite a few surveyors websites will tell you about osmosis
- look at http://www.yachtsurvey.com/BuyingBlisterBoat.htm for a fairly laid-back American essay on the subject by a surveyor,
much of which is to the effect that blisters are not usually that
much of a problem, apart from being unsightly. This being America,
of course, other articles on his website refer to new boat warranties
that specifically recommend not keeping boats in the water for
more than two weeks.
More information can also be found on Nigel
Clegg's website - see this PDF document for another explanation of osmosis and it treatment
Unfortunately the very experienced surveyor Jeffrey Casciani-Wood's
website, which used to have a very comprehensive article on osmosis,
has closed down, as he has retired from business. Extracts from
the articles there are however still online at http://www.mckaymarine.com.au/Surveying%20GRP.htm
This page is written by John Wilson
of Yachtsnet Ltd., from the point of view of a very experienced
small boat sailor, former owner of a yacht "with osmosis"
(the boat was purchased knowing it had blisters), and yacht broker.
© Yachtsnet Ltd. 2000/2018